Skip to main content

Board Game Review: Battle Ravens

I don’t play too many battlefield war games. We have a handful in our collection, but most of them are unopened and gathering dust. They are daunting multi-hour campaigns focused on traditional historic battles that my husband purchased on a whim but hasn’t found the time to play yet and I feel a bit intimidated by them so in shrink-wrap they sit and wait. Also, my tastes tend to gravitate toward fantasy themes so when I’m choosing games with combat to bring to the table, anything with historic characters is likely to be passed over in favor of elves or wizards. I suspect this description fits not only myself but a lot of my review readers, especially the female cohort. But it’s a new year and time to break out of my comfort zone. I’ve decided to give at least 5 battlefield war games a try this year and I’m starting with Battle Ravens. It’s a lightweight war game designed by Dan Mersey and published by Plastic Soldier Company. PSC funded the game on Kickstarter in November 2018 but you can still pre-order the game through PSC’s website:

I chose Battle Ravens as my first dip into war games because it plays quickly, supports two players (many war games are designed exclusively for solo play and I’m not into playing a game by myself for hours on end), and isn’t overly complex.

The artwork in Battle Ravens consists of illustrations with clean lines in a traditional color palette that reinforces the game’s theme of Viking age warfare. The components include cardboard cutouts for the warriors (members of the Norse and Anglo-Saxon armies) with plastic stands, standard dice, and a simple battlefield playing area made out of heavy cardboard. I was a bit disappointed that PSC didn’t invest in custom dice for this edition (note that the dice pictured in the image below are some from my personal collection and not the standard dice that came with the game). It’s more fun to see the success and failure symbols that carry the theme forward printed directly on the dice instead of having to translate the meaning of ordinary pips.


The gameplay in Battle Ravens is heavily luck based, with dice rolls determining battle success or failure. The strategy comes into play with the placement and use of raven tokens to allocate move and attack actions to different sectors (called shieldwall areas) of your battlefield and moderate warrior movement and attack strength . Other components which provide strategic influence include thralls which can be used to re-roll dice, and tactic cards which can be used to modify the rules in one’s favor. 

At the beginning of each round, players take turns placing raven tokens, one shieldwall area at a time. Each token you place in a shieldwall area can be used later during the action phase of the round to move one warrior to an adjacent shieldwall area on your side or attack your opponent’s shieldwall area directly across the board with one die. Players must commit these tokens to the areas without any certainty of how many they will need to gain the upper hand over their opponent and once placed they cannot be reallocated or added to during the round.

Once all raven tokens have been placed, the actions phase of the round begins. In this part of the round, players alternate turns activating shieldwall areas and then moving or attacking from that area. On your turn, you may use as many or as few raven tokens as you wish from the pool that have been allocated to the shieldwall area you’ve activated. For example, six raven tokens in a shieldwall area affords you the ability to move up to six warriors or roll an attack with up six dice. After you’ve performed a move or attack action, on your next turn (if you select this shieldwall area to activate again), any of the number of remaining raven tokens (#n) in the area can be used in the same manner to allocate movement or dice for up to #n warriors/dice.  Raven tokens can also be consumed to defend against opponent attacks, and just as with attack rolls, each token consumed allocates one die for the defense roll.

Once all of an opponent’s warriors in a shieldwall area have been destroyed, your warriors in the facing area move into the opponent’s area and claim it. The first person to claim 3 opponent shieldwall areas wins the game. If no one has won the game after all raven tokens have been consumed by performing actions in the first round, a new round begins.

Win Condition: capture three of your opponent’s shieldwall areas

Inputs: number of dice allocated per attack/defense roll and the outcomes of those rolls

Strategy Tip:  better to spend raven tokens to attack then defend

Battle Ravens is not subject to much analysis paralysis (AP). I’m the queen of AP and yet I was able to work through my turns without much hesitation. Part of the reason for that is the randomness introduced with the dice rolls. I didn’t mind how strongly chance is weighted in the game but it might be a turnoff for fans of heavy strategy games. That influence of luck could have easily been mitigated by tying the number of warriors in a shieldwall area to the potential outcomes of attack or defense rolls. It only makes sense that the number of men in your army would have an impact on battle success, so perhaps the game could be improved by using warrior count as a multiplier of the dice roll outcomes. To be fair, the strong bent toward random chance means the game is highly replayable as the unpredictable nature of play keeps things interesting.

I’m going to keep Battle Ravens in my board game library and will play it again. I think it would be especially good to play with teens as a lighter introduction to historical war games.

Publisher: Plastic Soldier Company
Players: 2
Actual Playing Time (vs the guideline on the box): About 30 minutes
Game type: area control, worker placement

Jenni’s rating scale:
OUI: I would play this game again; this game is ok. I probably would not buy this game myself but I would play it with those who own it and if someone gave it to me I would keep it.
OUI OUI: I would play this game again; this game is good. I would buy this game.
NON: I would not play this game again. I would return this game or give it away if it was given to me.


Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Review: Brass Birmingham

Here’s a story of a lovely lady (spoiler: it’s me) and her pride and how it has led to the discovery of the single greatest board game I have ever played. It’s probably also a good primer for other reviewers on increasing your reach.At GenCon this year, I was perusing the wares of the various booths and my eyes caught a glimpse of two beautiful game boxes. Each had crisp metallic lettering with an old world feel and artwork that radiated European class. I made my way to the booth and waited patiently to speak to to the team manning it as there were many buyers lined up to purchase the games. I didn’t know anything about the games (Brass Birmingham and Brass Lancashire), or the publisher – Roxley Game Laboratory – but I knew I wanted to review one or both of the games. Almost every board game love story I star in in can be summed up this way: I am seduced by the artwork or theme and then I stay for the right mechanics. When the lead rep spoke with me, he gently rejected my request. He …

Board Game Review: Brass Lancashire

A few months ago, I fell in love with Brass Birmingham (you can read that review HERE). I fell hard. It was an all time top 10 best games ever kind of love and so when Roxley Game Laboratory offered to send me Brass Lancashire to play and share my thoughts, I was a bit hesitant.  Is there even a chance I could enjoy it as much as Birmingham? Lancashire was the original game designed by Martin Wallace, and while it’s been updated for the most recent release, I was concerned it might prove to be an older, tired version that couldn’t compete with Birmingham.

My concerns were unfounded. Brass Lancashire is fantastic. Playing Lancashire after playing Birmingham is a bit like dating someone and then dating their sibling. Sure, there’s a resemblance, but the kissing feels different.
The artwork for Brass Lancashire is beautiful, radiating a classic style evocative of the theme (industrial era production). The artists have shown great attention to detail such as the raised gold lettering on …

Board Game Review: Machi Koro Legacy

Machi Koro  was one of the first games my husband Chris and I played together. It was released in 2012 and when we started gaming together in 2013, it was still a popular game on reviewer blogs and videos as we sought guidance in what to play and what to buy. Once Machi Koro  was in our collection, I spent every game trying my best to outthink Chris and acquire the best combination of establishment types to ensure victory. As we were enticed by other new games coming out and were drawn deeper into heavy Euros, we left Machi Koro on the shelf more frequently, with an occasional wistful comment about how we should play again.At GenCon earlier this year, Machi Koro Legacy  was the talk of the town. Designed by Rob Daviau, JR Honeycutt, and Masao Suganuma (Masao is the original designer of Machi Koro), it promised to breathe new life into Machi Koro through a campaign style series of ten games, revealing new aspects of gameplay in each session at the table. We love legacy games, so we wer…