Skip to main content

Euphoria: Build a Better Dystopia

I was delighted to receive Euphoria: Build a Better Dystopia just in time for Christmas in December. I had heard great things about the game, including its status as a Mensa Select winner, and I was eager to get it on the table for play.

The first time we opened the box, we were appreciative to find the components were nestled neatly inside GameTrayz. How thoughtful and practical is that? Kudos to Stonemaier for including the handy plastic organizers with the game.

In Euphoria, we take on the role of labor managers, trying to keep our workers dumb and happy so as to avoid them quitting as we work to gain enough influence to takeover the dystopian society we are all members of. A bit of a dark theme, even though the gameplay is fun. This is a classic worker placement game with some area control and set collection thrown in for good measure. It’s also a tense race to a point marker finish line (in this case 10) and it features the signature Stonemaier twist – almost every action you can perform in the game potentially benefits at least one other player. You can’t really help yourself without helping others as you visit markets, build tunnels, and construct new markets with your workers.

Euphoria doesn’t generate much analysis paralysis, so the running time tends to closely adhere to the time frame listed on the box. There’s a lot of options each turn, but almost always one seems to stand out as the obvious best choice. 

What’s rather unique about Euphoria is how it uses the value of the dice (which are your workers) as a representation of your workers’ intelligence and punishes you if the total intelligence among your collection of idle workers (that is, the sum of all dice that aren’t in play on the board) becomes too high. The consequence is that you must lose a worker; the highest numbered die is returned to the dice pool and is out of reach for you unless you put in the work and pay the cost to activate a worker again. It’s a very clever way to introduce some chaos.

Speaking of the dice, they’re quite lovely. I appreciated the custom design and the bright colors. What I did not appreciate was the break in pattern for the ratio of pips to white shapes on the dice. The die faces for numbers 1 through 4 feature a design where each individual pip is surrounded by a white shape. However for the numbers 5 and 6, all of the pips are grouped together inside one white shape. Several times this tripped up my gameplay as I mistook a 5 or 6 for a 1. I can’t be the only person that this has happened to.

The rest of the components are as sturdy and well made as the dice. There are wooden tokens, some cardboard tokens, cardboard markets, plastic coated playing card sized decks of recruits and artifacts, and the main board. Everything should hold up well, even under frequent use.

The rulebook is well written and easy to follow. I’ve just got one minor criticism here –I would like to see a picture of all the components instead of just a written description to aid first time players in identifying components.

Beautiful artwork is usually necessary to draw me into a board game and then great gameplay sustains my interest. The illustrations and overall graphic design in Euphoria are functional more than exquisite, so some who approach games as I do might pass the game by. Don’t. It’s an engaging and addictive board game that plays well at all the player counts we tested and I will pick up any expansion Stonemaier releases for this title.

Bonus: my husband Christopher, the film aficionado, points out that for lovers of great literature and film, there are plenty of little Easter eggs hidden throughout the game.

Win condition: reach 10 authority points before any other player

Inputs: allegiance track progress, market construction, market visits, ethical dilemma scoring, and Nimbus loft visits

Strategy Tip:  bump your own workers off single user locations repeatedly to create an efficient chain of actions


Publisher: Stonemaier
Players: 2-6 (We played with 2 and 4)
Actual Playing Time (vs the guideline on the box): About 70 minutes
Game type: worker placement, set collection, dice rolling, area control


Jenni’s rating scale:
OUI: I would play this game again; this game is ok. I probably would not buy this game myself but I would play it with those who own it and if someone gave it to me I would keep it.
OUI OUI: I would play this game again; this game is good. I would buy this game.
NON: I would not play this game again. I would return this game or give it away if it was given to me.


Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Review: Brass Birmingham

Here’s a story of a lovely lady (spoiler: it’s me) and her pride and how it has led to the discovery of the single greatest board game I have ever played. It’s probably also a good primer for other reviewers on increasing your reach. At GenCon this year, I was perusing the wares of the various booths and my eyes caught a glimpse of two beautiful game boxes. Each had crisp metallic lettering with an old world feel and artwork that radiated European class. I made my way to the booth and waited patiently to speak to to the team manning it as there were many buyers lined up to purchase the games. I didn’t know anything about the games (Brass Birmingham and Brass Lancashire), or the publisher – Roxley Game Laboratory – but I knew I wanted to review one or both of the games. Almost every board game love story I star in in can be summed up this way: I am seduced by the artwork or theme and then I stay for the right mechanics. When the lead rep spoke with me, he gently rejected my request. He

Board Game Review: Brass Lancashire

A few months ago, I fell in love with Brass Birmingham (you can read that review HERE ). I fell hard. It was an all time top 10 best games ever kind of love and so when Roxley Game Laboratory offered to send me Brass Lancashire to play and share my thoughts, I was a bit hesitant.  Is there even a chance I could enjoy it as much as Birmingham ? Lancashire was the original game designed by Martin Wallace, and while it’s been updated for the most recent release, I was concerned it might prove to be an older, tired version that couldn’t compete with Birmingham . My concerns were unfounded. Brass Lancashire is fantastic. Playing Lancashire after playing Birmingham is a bit like dating someone and then dating their sibling. Sure, there’s a resemblance, but the kissing feels different. The artwork for Brass Lancashire is beautiful, radiating a classic style evocative of the theme (industrial era production). The artists have shown great attention to detail such as the raised gold letter

Board Game Review: Machi Koro Legacy

M achi Koro   was one of the first games my husband Chris and I played together. It was released in 2012 and when we started gaming together in 2013, it was still a popular game on reviewer blogs and videos as we sought guidance in what to play and what to buy. Once Machi Koro   was in our collection, I spent every game trying my best to outthink Chris and acquire the best combination of establishment types to ensure victory. As we were enticed by other new games coming out and were drawn deeper into heavy Euros, we left Machi Koro on the shelf more frequently, with an occasional wistful comment about how we should play again. At GenCon earlier this year, Machi Koro Legacy   was the talk of the town. Designed by Rob Daviau, JR Honeycutt, and Masao Suganuma (Masao is the original designer of Machi Koro ), it promised to breathe new life into Machi Koro through a campaign style series of ten games, revealing new aspects of gameplay in each session at the table. We love legacy games, s