Skip to main content

Board Game Review: The Shipwreck Arcana

20181230_202016We hosted a lot of small gatherings in December and they presented the perfect opportunity to bring some games to the table that we hadn’t yet played. The Shipwreck Arcana was one of these games. My husband Christopher talked me into acquiring it, promising it would be something I’d enjoy. I was skeptical because he described it as a logical/mathematical pattern building puzzle game ( classifies it in the Math category among others) and I don’t tend to enjoy those as much as other types of games.

We played several games, usually with the full count of five players. The first thing I noticed when I unboxed the game was how pretty the Arcana cards are. The artwork is is unique in style and reminds me a bit of a tarot deck. It’s a pleasure to lay out the cards for display on the table. Components include the Hours card, the Arcana cards, fate tokens, score and doom trackers, number line tokens, and a velvet grab bag. All of the components are sturdy enough to hold up to frequent use although the cards will show wear and tear if not sleeved.

20181230_202219The second thing I noticed about the game is that its theme is weak. A well implemented theme is important for pulling me into a game. The Shipwreck Arcana provides only a thin backstory (players are “trapped in a drowned world” and must “use a mystical deck and a healthy dose of logic to predict each other’s fates and escape unscathed”) and can only manage to loosely drape the theme over the logic puzzle that this at the heart of this game.

In The Shipwreck Arcana, players take turns drawing numerical fate tokens from a bag (drawing back up to 2 tokens each turn), hiding the value of one of the tokens, and providing logical clues regarding the hidden value by placing their other fate token face up under one of the Arcana cards that are on display in the center of the play area. 20181230_202132

Each Arcana card has a logical statement on it such as “If one of your fates is double or triple the other, play one of them here”.  After the active player places one of their fate tokens under an Arcana card, all other players work cooperatively to deduce the numerical value of the active player’s hidden fate token, based on the clues provided by the Arcana card. To assist, the active player lays out a number line in their tableau (made up of number line tokens valued 1-7), and as the players work to determine the hidden fate token value they may ask the active player to turn over number line tokens representing values they have eliminated as possibilities. After the contemplation and discussion is complete, they may venture a guess, and if they are correct, a victory point is awarded (represented by 1 movement forward for the green token on the Hours card). If they are wrong, the red doom token advances forward on the Hours card. If the doom token reaches the 7th spot on the Hours card before the green token does, all players lose. Regardless of whether players opted to guess or not guess, after the drawing/contemplating/guessing phases finish, the fading phase occurs. Each fate token has a variable number of pips inscribed on it and if the collective sum of the pips on fate tokens that have been placed under an Arcana card exceeds the number of moons printed on the card, then the Arcana card fades. The fate tokens get tossed back in the grab bag, the Arcana card gets flipped over (offering a special one time action that may be used in a future turn to aid players), a new Arcana card is drawn and added to the display, and the doom token advances on the Hours card by two if a correct prediction was not made.

What I realized from playing The Shipwreck Arcana is that groups can play to win as quickly as possible (taking guesses freely even when the logical clues don’t conclusively point to one specific value for the hidden fate token) or play to maximize the puzzle solving experience (guessing only when the hidden value can be fully deduced from the clues). Players who have a high tolerance for risk and less interest in puzzling out the answers will usually opt for the former. I’m that kind of player. I rolled my eyes every time the other players wanted to hold back a guess. Their reasoning was that there was no card at risk for fading (and thus no penalty for abstaining from guessing) and since they weren’t absolutely certain of the hidden value it wasn’t worth the risk. I thought that was ridiculous, especially when our green token was several spaces ahead of the doom token. “We can afford 5 wrong guesses!”, I’d exclaim, exasperated. “What’s the holdup? Do we want to win this or not?”. Christopher: My wife wanted to guess at 20/80 odds even when no card was at risk for fading. Her preference for risk is VERY very high.

The rules for The Shipwreck Arcana are fairly straightforward.

Win Condition: score tracker (green) reaches the 7th hour before the doom tracker (red) does.

Inputs: correct guesses of the active player’s hidden fate token value.

Strategy Tip: Don’t be afraid to guess even if you’re not sure, especially when playing on beginner level.

The Shipwreck Arcana is a ok filler game in which risk takers can fare just as well as logic puzzlers, especially on easier levels. Its strengths include its resistance to analysis paralysis, striking and original artwork, replayability, and the ease of learning the game for new players. Its only weaknesses are poor theming and the conflict it may introduce between players who want to puzzle everything out to certainty and those that want to take risky guesses to push ahead on the Hours card.

Christopher: This is not a filler game, in the traditional sense of the word. It is a meaty puzzle game that plays quickly. I highly recommend it.


Publisher: Meromorph Games
Players: 2-5 (We played with 4 and 5)
Actual Playing Time (vs the guideline on the box): about 20 minutes per game
Game type: pattern building, deduction

Jenni’s Rating:                                           


Christopher’s Rating:


Rating scale:
OUI: I would play this game again; this game is ok. I probably would not buy this game myself but I would play it with those who own it and if someone gave it to me I would keep it.
OUI OUI: I would play this game again; this game is good. I would buy this game.
NON: I would not play this game again. I would return this game or give it away if it was given to me.


Popular posts from this blog

Board Game Review: Brass Birmingham

Here’s a story of a lovely lady (spoiler: it’s me) and her pride and how it has led to the discovery of the single greatest board game I have ever played. It’s probably also a good primer for other reviewers on increasing your reach.At GenCon this year, I was perusing the wares of the various booths and my eyes caught a glimpse of two beautiful game boxes. Each had crisp metallic lettering with an old world feel and artwork that radiated European class. I made my way to the booth and waited patiently to speak to to the team manning it as there were many buyers lined up to purchase the games. I didn’t know anything about the games (Brass Birmingham and Brass Lancashire), or the publisher – Roxley Game Laboratory – but I knew I wanted to review one or both of the games. Almost every board game love story I star in in can be summed up this way: I am seduced by the artwork or theme and then I stay for the right mechanics. When the lead rep spoke with me, he gently rejected my request. He …

Board Game Review: Brass Lancashire

A few months ago, I fell in love with Brass Birmingham (you can read that review HERE). I fell hard. It was an all time top 10 best games ever kind of love and so when Roxley Game Laboratory offered to send me Brass Lancashire to play and share my thoughts, I was a bit hesitant.  Is there even a chance I could enjoy it as much as Birmingham? Lancashire was the original game designed by Martin Wallace, and while it’s been updated for the most recent release, I was concerned it might prove to be an older, tired version that couldn’t compete with Birmingham.

My concerns were unfounded. Brass Lancashire is fantastic. Playing Lancashire after playing Birmingham is a bit like dating someone and then dating their sibling. Sure, there’s a resemblance, but the kissing feels different.
The artwork for Brass Lancashire is beautiful, radiating a classic style evocative of the theme (industrial era production). The artists have shown great attention to detail such as the raised gold lettering on …

Board Game Review: Machi Koro Legacy

Machi Koro  was one of the first games my husband Chris and I played together. It was released in 2012 and when we started gaming together in 2013, it was still a popular game on reviewer blogs and videos as we sought guidance in what to play and what to buy. Once Machi Koro  was in our collection, I spent every game trying my best to outthink Chris and acquire the best combination of establishment types to ensure victory. As we were enticed by other new games coming out and were drawn deeper into heavy Euros, we left Machi Koro on the shelf more frequently, with an occasional wistful comment about how we should play again.At GenCon earlier this year, Machi Koro Legacy  was the talk of the town. Designed by Rob Daviau, JR Honeycutt, and Masao Suganuma (Masao is the original designer of Machi Koro), it promised to breathe new life into Machi Koro through a campaign style series of ten games, revealing new aspects of gameplay in each session at the table. We love legacy games, so we wer…